Evaluation Criteria
- Performance: IOPS, throughput, and latency for your specific workload mix
- Scalability: Maximum capacity, performance scaling, and upgrade path
- Data services: Snapshots, replication, encryption, deduplication, compression
- Management: GUI usability, API/automation support, monitoring integration
- Support: Response time SLAs, proactive monitoring, hardware replacement
- TCO: Hardware, software licensing, support, power, cooling, and operational costs over 5 years
All-Flash Array Evaluation
Key all-flash array evaluation criteria: performance at your workload mix (not just peak IOPS), data reduction ratios for your data types, non-disruptive upgrade path, and support quality. Request a proof of concept with your actual workloads before committing.
Test performance with all data services enabled — deduplication and compression can reduce performance by 10–30% on some systems. Verify that advertised performance is achievable with your data types and access patterns.
AI Storage Evaluation
AI storage evaluation focuses on throughput, not IOPS. Key criteria: aggregate read throughput (GB/s), scalability (can throughput scale with cluster size?), and S3 API compatibility for dataset management. Test with actual AI training workloads — synthetic benchmarks do not represent AI access patterns.
Software-Defined Storage Evaluation
SDS evaluation must account for operational complexity — SDS requires more expertise to deploy and manage than purpose-built storage arrays. Key criteria: performance on commodity hardware, operational tooling quality, vendor support for the SDS platform, and total cost including operational labor.
Vendor Comparison
| Vendor | Strengths | Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Pure Storage | Best all-flash performance; Evergreen subscription; excellent support | Premium pricing; limited to all-flash |
| NetApp | Broadest portfolio; strong data management; ONTAP ecosystem | Complex licensing; higher operational overhead |
| Dell PowerStore | Good price/performance; broad portfolio; strong enterprise relationships | Complex product line; variable support quality |
| WEKA | Best AI storage throughput; cloud-native; NVMe-based | Newer vendor; higher cost; requires expertise |
| Vast Data | Universal storage platform; excellent scalability; strong AI capabilities | Newer vendor; limited track record at scale |
Common Mistakes
- Evaluating on vendor benchmarks: Test with your actual workloads in your environment
- Ignoring data reduction variability: AI data achieves minimal data reduction — plan capacity accordingly
- Underestimating software costs: Storage software licenses can add 30–50% to hardware costs
- Not planning for AI workloads: Traditional enterprise storage criteria are insufficient for AI
- Selecting on price alone: The cheapest storage is rarely the best value over a 5-year lifecycle